Brad Kroft v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Indiana’s tail lamp statute, which required the lamp to emit “a red light plainly visible from a distance of five hundred (500
• determining that a tail lamp was still in good working order despite a dime-sized hole because there was no evidence the hole affected the visibility of the light to another vehicle
• determining that a tail lamp was still in good working order despite a dime-sized hole because there was no evidence the hole affected the visibility of the light to another vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).