Brad Buehrle v. City of Key West

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs could not bring a constitutional challenge to an entire licensing scheme at the summary judgment stage where pleadings challenged only one section of it
• holding that tattoos display the message of both the artists and the customer
• holding that tattoos display the message of both the artists and the customer
• holding that tattooing is artistic expression protected by the First Amendment
• observing that “the Supreme Court has never explicitly defined the entire universe of artistic expression safeguarded by the First Amendment”
• noting that protection under the First Amendment “extends to various forms of artistic expression,” including “films, paintings, drawings, and engravings” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).