· 1/11/1995
Brad Bangerter v. Orem City Corporation, a Utah Municipal Corporation
Citations
- 46 F.3d 1491
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 471
- 1995 WL 10478
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an ordinance that singled out the handicapped and applied different rules to them was facially discriminatory
- holding that an ordinance that singled out the handicapped and applied different rules to them was facially discriminatory
- holding that an ordinance that singled out the handicapped and applied different rules to them was facially discriminatory
- holding that “two potential justifica- tions” are “benign discrimination” and “public safety”
- explaining “a plaintiff need not prove the malice or discriminatory animus of a defendant to make out a case of intentional discrimination”
- requiring an ordinance facially discriminating against disabled persons to be justified by “benign discrimination” or “public safety”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brorby, McWilliams, Ebel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.