Skip to main content
· 1/11/1995

Brad Bangerter v. Orem City Corporation, a Utah Municipal Corporation

Citations

  • 46 F.3d 1491
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 471
  • 1995 WL 10478

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an ordinance that singled out the handicapped and applied different rules to them was facially discriminatory
  • holding that an ordinance that singled out the handicapped and applied different rules to them was facially discriminatory
  • holding that an ordinance that singled out the handicapped and applied different rules to them was facially discriminatory
  • holding that “two potential justifica- tions” are “benign discrimination” and “public safety”
  • explaining “a plaintiff need not prove the malice or discriminatory animus of a defendant to make out a case of intentional discrimination”
  • requiring an ordinance facially discriminating against disabled persons to be justified by “benign discrimination” or “public safety”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brorby, McWilliams, Ebel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.