Skip to main content
· 8/30/1951

Brackett v. Woodall Food Products, Inc.

Citations

  • 12 F.R.D. 4
  • 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • preclusion denied where defendant had information necessary to prepare defendant and a “preclusion order would constitute an unnecessarily drastic remedy under the circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Darr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.