Bracken v. Sullivan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding two law enforcement officers acted within the scope of their duties when investigating a crime, even if their actions were conducted improperly
• holding two law enforcement officers acted within the scope of their duties when investigating a crime, even if their actions were conducted improperly
• finding that the law enforcement officers were within the scope of their employment under the TTCA because they were generally acting within the scope of their duties in investigating a potential crime, applying for a warrant, and making an arrest
• “[The Supreme Court of Texas] held that § 101.106 ‘foreclose[s] suit against a government employee in his individual capacity if he was acting within the scope of employment.’” (quoting Franka v. Velasquez, 332 S.W.3d 367 (Tex. 2011)
• discussing scope of employment in context of § 101.106(f)
• discussing the ultra vires exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).