Braasch v. Goldschmidt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that complaint stated claim based on actions taken before short-form merger in which ―the merger was the final step of a conspiracy to accomplish an unlawful end by unlawful means‖
• short-form merger that is the merely the culmination of conspiracy to loot the company at expense of minority stockholders is not subject to Stauffer’s exclusivity rule
• allegations that short-form merger not fraudulent in itself was the “final step” in a “conspiracy’ against minority shareholders were sufficient to survive motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).