Br Mnstry Inc v. Rossotti, Charles O.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a plaintiff asserting a Free Exercise Clause claim “must first establish that its free exercise right has been substantially burdened”
• concluding that the conditioning of tax-exempt status on a withdrawal by the Church from electoral politics was not a substantial burden on the exercise of religion where “the Church d[id] not maintain that a withdrawal from electoral politics would violate its beliefs”
• “To sustain its claim under either the Constitution or [RFRA], [plaintiff] must first establish that its free exercise right has been substantially burdened.”
• “To sustain its claim under either the [Free Exercise Clause] or [RFRA], [a plaintiff] must first establish that its free exercise right has been substantially burdened.”
• “To sustain its claim under either the [Free Exercise Clause] or [RFRA], [a plaintiff] must first establish that its free exercise right has been substantially burdened.”
• “To establish selective prosecution, the [plaintiff] must “prove that (1) [he] was singled out for prosecution from among others similarly situated and (2) that [the] prosecution was improperly motivated, i.e., based on race, religion or another arbitrary classification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).