BPA International, Inc. v. Kingdom of Sweden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to permit jurisdictional discovery when “nothing in the record” suggested that more discovery “would or could be helpful to establish jurisdiction”
• “Telia’s general counsel avers that BPA International could assert its claims in the courts of Sweden and that each of the defendants are subject to the jurisdiction of the appropriate 72 Swedish courts.” (emphasis added and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Actual notice does not fulfill the requirements of Rule 4(h)(1).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).