Skip to main content
· 1/6/2012

B.P. v. New York City Department of Education

Citations

  • 841 F. Supp. 2d 605
  • 2012 WL 33984
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that this three-factor test applies “outside the context of Rule 60(b)(4)”
  • “[A] showing that a default was inadvertent is sufficient . . . to vacate a default judgment.”
  • “Rule 60(b)(4) is ‘unique’ because ‘relief is not discretionary and a meritorious defense is not necessary.’” (quoting Covington Indus. v. Resintex A.G., 629 F.2d 730, 733 n.3 (2d Cir. 1980))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kuntz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.