Skip to main content
· 9/19/2002

BP America Production Co. v. Madsen

Citations

  • 2002 WY 135
  • 53 P.3d 1088
  • 156 Oil & Gas Rep. 193
  • 2002 Wyo. LEXIS 149
  • 2002 WL 31084921

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing “the definite article ‘the’ is a word of limitation”
  • “I]n construing statutes, the definite article ‘the’ is a word of limitation as opposed to the indefinite or generalizing force of ‘a’ or ‘an.’”
  • “[T]he definite article ‘the’ is a word of limitation as opposed to the indefinite or generalizing force of ‘a’ or ‘an.’ ”
  • “[T]he definite article ‘the’ is a word of limitation as opposed to the indefinite or generalizing force of ‘a’ or ‘an.’ ”
  • “[I]n construing statutes, the definite article ‘the’ is a word of limitation as opposed to the indefinite or generalizing force of ‘a’ or ‘an.’”
  • “Other courts agree that, in construing statutes, the definite article ‘the’ is a word of limitation as opposed to the indefinite or generalizing force of ‘a’ or ‘an.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Golden, Lehman, Voigt, Kalokathis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.