· 9/19/2002
BP America Production Co. v. Madsen
Citations
- 2002 WY 135
- 53 P.3d 1088
- 156 Oil & Gas Rep. 193
- 2002 Wyo. LEXIS 149
- 2002 WL 31084921
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing “the definite article ‘the’ is a word of limitation”
- “I]n construing statutes, the definite article ‘the’ is a word of limitation as opposed to the indefinite or generalizing force of ‘a’ or ‘an.’”
- “[T]he definite article ‘the’ is a word of limitation as opposed to the indefinite or generalizing force of ‘a’ or ‘an.’ ”
- “[T]he definite article ‘the’ is a word of limitation as opposed to the indefinite or generalizing force of ‘a’ or ‘an.’ ”
- “[I]n construing statutes, the definite article ‘the’ is a word of limitation as opposed to the indefinite or generalizing force of ‘a’ or ‘an.’”
- “Other courts agree that, in construing statutes, the definite article ‘the’ is a word of limitation as opposed to the indefinite or generalizing force of ‘a’ or ‘an.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill, Golden, Lehman, Voigt, Kalokathis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.