Bozzuto's, Inc. v. Vinci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that only a named defendant can remove a case to federal court
• noting that under Murphy Brothers, “mere unofficial notice of a lawsuit is not 7 enough” to start the removal clock
• explaining that federal courts “must enforce congressionally ** The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2
• finding district court erred by failing to remand 1 where the party who removed the case was not a named defendant
• finding district court erred by failing to remand where the party who 28 removed the case was not a named defendant
• finding district court erred by failing to remand 5 || where the party who removed the case was not a named defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).