Bozer v. Higgins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that county courthouse searches are permissible because they are consensual and reasonable, based on the governmental interest of protecting judicial officers and court visitors, minimally intrusive, and uniformly applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bozer v. Higgins
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-05-27· cited 11×
• People v. Spalding
  Criminal Court of the City of New York· 2004-03-30· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Finlayson
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1980-09-22· cited 106×
• People v. Price
  New York Court of Appeals· 1981-12-22· cited 56×
• Barrett v. Kunzig
  M.D. Tennessee· 1971-08-11· cited 17×
• Legal Aid Soc. of Orange County v. Crosson
  S.D. New York· 1992-02-26· cited 17×
• Herald Co. v. Weisenberg
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-10-29· cited 17×
• People v. Rincon
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-03-03· cited 13×
• People v. Rose
  New York County Courts· 1975-05-06· cited 9×
• People v. Schoonmaker
  New York County Courts· 1971-01-15· cited 8×
• People v. Dean
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1980-12-11· cited 5×
• Bowles v. State
  New York State Court of Claims· 1946-01-15· cited 2×