Skip to main content

Boyle v. State

Citations

  • 214 S.W.3d 250
  • 363 Ark. 356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the exclusion of testimony was harmless where the same evidence was introduced through other witnesses
  • using “reversible error” language while conducting an abuse of discretion review
  • testimony of woman with whom defendant flirted following the death of his wife was relevant to lack of grief and not overly prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jim Gunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.