Boyle v. Oleson
Citations
- 58 Wash. 670
- 109 P. 203
- 1910 Wash. LEXIS 989
Syllabus
<p>Equity—Laches—Estoppel. Where a divorced wife acquiesced in a property settlement releasing her husband of all claims and demands, and in a decree of divorce finding that there was no “common property,” for a period of seventeen years and died without making any claim to other property acquired by the husband for a small sum prior to the decree and settlement, although she knew three years before her death of the time of the acquisition of such other property, she and those claiming under her thirty years after the settlement are estopped by laches from claiming that such other property was the common property of the husband and wife; he having improved it and claimed it as his separate estate.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating closed facility which has beds in abeyance “is still an ‘existing’ facility for purposes of the CON process. The CON statute does not require a CON if a facility attempts to Page 5 of 38 reopen within sixty months of ceasing to operate.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chadwick, Fullerton, Gose, Morris, Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.