Skip to main content
· 2/9/2005

Boyle v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission

Citations

  • 867 A.2d 1050
  • 385 Md. 142
  • 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 652
  • 2005 Md. LEXIS 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agreement required plaintiff to prosecute claim against remaining defendant and plaintiff could not settle the claim for under $20,000 without the consent of the settling defendant
  • “[A]s an entity and not a law enforcement officer, [a company] is not entitled to any benefit under [the] LEOBR.” (emphasis added)
  • “[T]he LEOBR procedural protections apply only when there is a prospect of disciplinary action or punitive measure____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Raker, Wilner, Cathell, Harrell, Battaglia, Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.