Boyle v. Jerome Country Club

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “persuasive evidence of a congressional intent not to require Title II public facilities to reasonably accommodate the religious beliefs of patrons.”
• dismissing 9 case for failure to comply with Title II notice requirement because “a vital jurisdictional 10 prerequisite to this suit is absent”
• “[I]t is clear that notice under the statute is a jurisdictional prerequisite to filing a civil action in federal court.”
• “To go beyond the intended language of Title II, and require public facilities to affirmatively accommodate patrons’ religious beliefs ... is not appropriate nor allowed under the applicable legislation.”
• “The foregoing provision clearly requires that Title I plaintiffs give prior notice to state or local authorities when a state or local law prohibits religious discrimination in public accommodations, and where the CV-90 (03/15

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).