Boykin v. State
Citations
- 80 Fla. 200
- 85 So. 651
Syllabus
<p>1. Where there is some substantial competent evidence of all the facts legally essential to support the verdict and there is nothing in the record to indicate that the jury was not governed by the evidence a refusal of the trial court to grant a new trial on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict will not be disturbed by an appellate court.</p> <p>2. A verdict of guilty of assault with intent to. commit murder in the second degree upon a charge of assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree will be sustained if the evidence shows an assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree or in the second degree as defined in the statute, sinec the latter offense is regarded as being included in the former.</p>
Judges: Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-06-15· cited 44×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-07-08· cited 19×
- Barrentine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-06-13· cited 19×
- McClellan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-10-28· cited 16×
- Messer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-04-25· cited 12×
- Feagle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 9×
- Grace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-11-24· cited 8×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-04-09· cited 5×
- Jarman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-07-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.