Skip to main content

Boykin v. State

Citations

  • 592 S.E.2d 426
  • 264 Ga. App. 836
  • 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 3720
  • 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 1505

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “before the harsh sanction of excluding the evidence will be imposed by the trial court, OCGA § 17-16-6 requires the defendant to show both that he was prejudiced and that the [Sítate acted in bad faith”
  • asportation element satisfied when defendant forced victi from car with handgun and made him lie on the ground
  • “Only the slightest movement of the victim is required to constitute the necessary element of asportation.”
  • defendant was in joint constructive possession of marijuana that was taken from the victim by a co-defendant during a hijacking to which the defendant was a party
  • defendant must show that the State acted in bad faith and that he was prejudiced before the trial court will impose the harsh sanction of excluding evidence
  • defendant must show that the state acted in bad faith and that he was prejudiced before the trial court will impose the harsh sanction of excluding evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Eldridge, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.