Boyer v. Boyer
Citations
- 113 U.S. 689
- 5 S. Ct. 706
- 28 L. Ed. 1089
- 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1722
Syllabus
<p>The laws of Pennsylvania exempted from local taxation, for county purposes, railroad securities ; shares of stock held by stockholders in corporations which were liable to pay certain taxes to the State; mortgages; judgments; recognizances; moneys due on contracts for sale of real estate ; and loans by corporations, which were taxable for State purposes, when the State tax should be paid. The pleadings in this case admitted, in detail, large amounts of exempted property under these heads in the State: Held, That, under these circumstances, this constituted a discrimination in favor of other .'moneyed capital against capital invested in shares in national banks, which was inconsistent with the provision in § 5219 Rev. Stat., that the taxation by State authority of national bank shares shall not be at.a greater rate than is assessed upon other moneyed cápital in the hands of individual citizens of such State.</p> <p>The previous decisions of this court respecting State and local taxation of shares in national banks considered and reviewed.</p> <p>The former decisions of this court do not sustain the proposition that national bank shares may be subjected, under the authority of the State, to local taxation where a very material part, relatively, of other moneyed capital in the hands of individual citizens within the same'jurisdiction or taxing district is exempted from such taxation.</p> <p>While exact uniformity or equality of taxation cannot be expected under any system, capital invested in national bank shares was intended by Congress to be placed upon the same footing of substantial equality in respect of taxation by State authority as the State establishes for other moneyed capital in the hands of individual citizens, however invested, whether in State bank shares or otherwise.</p>
Judges: Harlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mercantile Bank v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1887-04-04· cited 215×
- First Nat. Bank of Guthrie Center v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 137×
- Concordia Fire Insurance Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1934-10-12· cited 74×
- Merchants' Nat. Bank of Richmond v. RichmondSupreme Court· 1921-06-06· cited 71×
- Jaybird Mining Co. v. WeirSupreme Court· 1926-06-07· cited 71×
- Wasson v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court· 1886-06-25· cited 27×
- Voran v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas· 1930-02-08· cited 27×
- Ankeny v. BlakleyOregon Supreme Court· 1903-12-07· cited 23×
- Voran v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas· 1929-11-09· cited 21×
- People v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court· 1916-04-20· cited 20×
- First National Bank v. McBrideNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1915-05-24· cited 19×
- First National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1923-02-17· cited 19×
- McHenry v. DownerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-02-03· cited 18×
- Morley, Comm'r of Revenues v. RemmelSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1949-06-06· cited 17×
- City of St. Mary's v. St. Mary's Native Corp.Alaska Supreme Court· 2000-09-29· cited 14×
- State ex rel. Farmers State Bank v. WallaceNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1922-02-21· cited 13×
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court· 1962-08-14· cited 11×
- Warren Realty Co. v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-07-10· cited 9×
- First National Bank v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa· 1892-05-28· cited 9×
- National Bank of Commerce v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1929-08-09· cited 6×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.