Boyer v. Boyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the court “should consider whether there are exceptional circumstances that overcome the general presumption that marital property should be divided equally between the parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Goggin v. Goggin
  Utah Supreme Court· 2013-03-15· cited 42×
• Taft v. Taft
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2016-06-30· cited 34×
• Tobler v. Tobler
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2014-10-09· cited 30×
• West v. Christensen
  D. Utah· 2017-08-01· cited 30×
• Miner v. Miner
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2021-07-15· cited 20×
• Roberts v. Roberts
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2014-09-05· cited 20×
• McPherson v. McPherson
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2011-11-10· cited 18×
• Eberhard v. Eberhard
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2019-06-27· cited 13×
• Hansen v. Hansen
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2014-04-24· cited 11×
• Johnson v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2012-01-26· cited 7×
• Summer v. Summer
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2012-06-01· cited 6×
• Woolums v. Woolums
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2013-09-26· cited 6×
• Chesley v. Chesley
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2017-07-28· cited 6×
• Allen v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2014-01-30· cited 5×
• Mullins v. Mullins
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2016-04-14· cited 4×
• Knowlton v. Knowlton
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2023-02-09· cited 4×
• Osborne v. Osborne
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2016-02-11· cited 2×
• Bjarnson v. Bjarnson
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2020-10-16· cited 2×
• Stephenson v. Stephenson
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2025-10-17