Boyer v. Belleque

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that in a federal habeas action, the review of a sufficiency of the 10 evidence challenge is doubly deferential
• “[W]hen we assess a sufficiency of evidence challenge [by] a state prisoner seeking federal habeas corpus relief subject to the strictures of AEDPA, there is a double dose of deference that can rarely be surmounted.”
• “[W]hen we assess a 22 sufficiency of evidence challenge in the case of a state prisoner seeking federal habeas corpus 23 relief subject to the strictures of AEDPA, there is a double dose of deference that can rarely be 24 surmounted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).