Boyer v. Belleque

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that in a federal habeas action, the review of a sufficiency of the 10 evidence challenge is doubly deferential
• “[W]hen we assess a sufficiency of evidence challenge [by] a state prisoner seeking federal habeas corpus relief subject to the strictures of AEDPA, there is a double dose of deference that can rarely be surmounted.”
• “[W]hen we assess a 22 sufficiency of evidence challenge in the case of a state prisoner seeking federal habeas corpus 23 relief subject to the strictures of AEDPA, there is a double dose of deference that can rarely be 24 surmounted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ronneld Johnson v. W. Montgomery
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-08-15· cited 38×
• Kimberly Long v. Deborah K. Johnson
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-12-02· cited 31×
• Silva v. McDonald
  C.D. California· 2012-08-24· cited 11×
• Willis Creech v. Scott Frauenheim
  Ninth Circuit· 2015-08-31· cited 10×
• Douglas Bradford v. Daniel Paramo
  Ninth Circuit· 2024-05-03· cited 4×
• Davis v. Johnson
  N.D. California· 2019-02-22· cited 2×
• Gonzales v. Gipson
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-07-03· cited 2×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Williams v. Taylor
  Supreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
• Harrington v. Richter
  Supreme Court· 2011-01-19· cited 13,244×
• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Woodford v. Visciotti
  Supreme Court· 2002-11-04· cited 2,207×
• Penry v. Johnson
  Supreme Court· 2001-06-04· cited 946×
• Donald Eugene Lambert v. James Blodgett, Donald Eugene Lambert v. James Blodgett
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-12-28· cited 542×
• Juan H. v. Walter Allen III
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-07-08· cited 403×
• Delgadillo v. Woodford
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-06-03· cited 208×
• Edmund Y. Chein v. Richard Shumsky, Chief Probation Officer, La County California State Attorney General
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-06-25· cited 78×
• State v. Walters
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-01-17· cited 66×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-05-05· cited 22×
• Carol STANTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Janice BENZLER, Acting Warden, Respondent-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-06-17· cited 20×
• State v. Hinkhouse
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-03-06· cited 6×
• State v. Hinkhouse
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-01· cited 3×

Other cases named Boyer v. Belleque

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Boyer v. BELLEQUE
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-10-18