Boyer v. Abston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the defendants’ predecessor permitted hunters, miners and neighbors to use a road on the defendant’s property that the plaintiff did not build, the non-exclusive character of the plaintiffs use militated against the claim of a prescriptive easement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).