Skip to main content
· 12/15/1998

Boydston v. Strole Development Co.

Citations

  • 969 P.2d 653
  • 193 Ariz. 47
  • 284 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 19
  • 1998 Ariz. LEXIS 648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that notice of appeal filed by nonlawyer on corporation’s behalf does not necessarily deprive court of jurisdiction to consider motion to amend and cautioning “against the use of the word ‘jurisdiction’ beyond its core meaning”
  • holding cure reasonable where appellee did not mislead or prejudice
  • holding cure reasonable where appellee did not mislead or prejudice
  • notice of appeal filed by non-lawyer on behalf of corporation not automatically null, and corporation should be given reasonable time to cure defect
  • “[E]ven if defective, a notice of appeal is sufficient if it is neither misleading nor prejudicial.”
  • a corporation may cure its defective appearance after being given a reasonable opportunity by the court to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martone, Zlaket, Feldman, Druke, Jones, McGregor, Ariz, Const, Arizona

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.