Skip to main content
· 6/8/1987

Boyds Civic Ass'n v. Montgomery County Council

Citations

  • 526 A.2d 598
  • 309 Md. 683
  • 1987 Md. LEXIS 242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that \the purpose of the ripeness doctrine is to ensure that adjudication will dispose of an actual controversy in a conclusive and binding manner\
  • observing that “the purpose of the ripeness doctrine is to ensure that adjudication will dispose of an actual controversy in a conclusive and binding manner”
  • noting that “master plans are not invariably advisory. For example, a county’s subdivision regulations may validly require subdivision proposals to conform to a master plan.”
  • explaining that the ripeness doctrine’s purpose is “to ensure that adjudication will dispose of an actual controversy”
  • observing that the purpose of the ripeness doctrine is to “ensure that adjudication will dispose of an actual controversy in a conclusive and binding manner”
  • “[U]nder the statute, the existence of a justiciable controversy is an absolute prerequisite to the maintenance of a declaratory judgment action.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, Couch, McAuliffe, Smith, Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.