Wyoming Supreme Court· 6/19/2020
Boyd Van Fleet v. Marceline A. Guyette
Citations
- 466 P.3d 812
- 2020 WY 78
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding courts have inherent and statutory authority to enforce their orders through civil contempt sanctions
- finding no abuse of discretion where Father failed to submit the required financial affidavit and the court relied on an affidavit from Mother’s attorney who investigated his income
- Court has no realistic means of evaluating prejudice without an offer of proof
- “Because Father did not make an offer of proof to establish the relevance of the child’s testimony to the motions hearing, we have no way to gauge its admissibility or any prejudice that may have resulted from its exclusion.”
- “Rule 10.05 sanctions are generally not available for challenges to discretionary rulings, unless an appeal lacks cogent argument, there is an absence of pertinent legal authority to support the issues, or there is a failure to adequately cite to the record.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jontra Holdings Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company Brisbane Angels Nominees Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company and Associated Construction Equipment Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company v. Gas Sensing Technology Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation D/B/A WelldogWyoming Supreme Court· 2021-01-29· cited 26×
- In the Interest Of: RR, KR and RR, Minor Children, FR v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2021-07-26· cited 25×
- Kelsey N. Sears v. Timothy L. SearsWyoming Supreme Court· 2021-02-02· cited 18×
- Jennifer P. Hanft, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Bret Lee Vance v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court· 2021-04-15· cited 16×
- In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights To: Tjh, Minor Child, Christine Dawn Herden v. State of Wyoming, Ex Rel. Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court· 2021-04-27· cited 15×
- Leah Ruth Rush v. Joseph Robert GolkowskiWyoming Supreme Court· 2021-02-12· cited 14×
- Arsenio Lemus v. Merissa MartinezWyoming Supreme Court· 2021-05-11· cited 13×
- Benjamin Greer Marquis v. Laura Ann Marquis n/k/a Laura Ann FausettWyoming Supreme Court· 2020-11-20· cited 12×
- Elisha Schlafke Baer v. John S. Baer IiiWyoming Supreme Court· 2022-12-30· cited 7×
- Todd Andrew Domenico v. Josie Daniel f/k/a Josie Daniel DomenicoWyoming Supreme Court· 2024-01-10· cited 5×
- Brendon A. Boyce v. Julie A. Jarvis, f/k/a Julie A. BoyceWyoming Supreme Court· 2021-06-30· cited 5×
- Jessica J. Hehn v. David V. Johnson, IIWyoming Supreme Court· 2022-06-10· cited 4×
- Hopeful, a Wyoming partnership consisting of Edward F. Murray, Jr., Donald F. Murray, William M. Murray, Mary Ann Kulas f/k/a Mary Ann Hollis, and Ted Simola Hopeful Ltd., a Wyoming partnership consisting of Edward F. Murray, Jr., Donald F. Murray, William M. Murray, Mary Ann Hollis, and Ted Simola and Ted Simola, an individual v. Etchepare, L.L.C., a Wyoming limited liability company Ned Murray Co., a Wyoming partnership GBK Investments, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company and EOG ResWyoming Supreme Court· 2023-05-03· cited 3×
- Lelon Thomas Tucker v. Nichelle Ann Tucker F/K/A Nichelle Ann JoinerWyoming Supreme Court· 2023-06-14· cited 2×
- Hopeful, a Wyoming partnership consisting of Edward F. Murray, Jr., Donald F. Murray, William M. Murray, Mary Ann Kulas f/k/a Mary Ann Hollis, and Ted Simola Hopeful Ltd., a Wyoming partnership consisting of Edward F. Murray, Jr., Donald F. Murray, William M. Murray, Mary Ann Hollis, and Ted Simola and Ted Simola, an individual v. Etchepare, L.L.C., a Wyoming limited liability company Ned Murray Co., a Wyoming partnership GBK Investments, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company and EOG ResWyoming Supreme Court· 2023-04-20· cited 1×
- In the Matter of the Sanction Fee of Christopher Goetz: Christopher Goetz, Defense Attorney for Jordan Ryan Borrego v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2025-07-29
Cites
53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Scherling v. KilgoreWyoming Supreme Court· 1979-09-07· cited 113×
- Cranston v. CranstonWyoming Supreme Court· 1994-08-18· cited 58×
- Brown v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court· 2011-02-25· cited 54×
- Clark v. AlexanderWyoming Supreme Court· 1998-02-19· cited 53×
- Jeffrey R. Arnott v. Paula a/k/a Polly A. ArnottWyoming Supreme Court· 2012-12-28· cited 48×
- Anita Harmon, as an Individual and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Euella PotterWyoming Supreme Court· 2014-07-16· cited 47×
- Dowdy v. DowdyWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-11-04· cited 39×
- Jones v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-08-09· cited 38×
- Pinther v. PintherWyoming Supreme Court· 1995-01-13· cited 36×
- Daniel L. Stevens v. Kacie J. StevensWyoming Supreme Court· 2014-02-20· cited 36×
- Hanson v. BelvealWyoming Supreme Court· 2012-07-19· cited 35×
- Steven F. LudlowWyoming Supreme Court· 2015-03-24· cited 32×
- Moore v. MooreWyoming Supreme Court· 1991-04-12· cited 30×
- Kimberly Shindell v. Roger ShindellWyoming Supreme Court· 2014-04-22· cited 27×
- Long v. LongWyoming Supreme Court· 2018-03-12· cited 24×
- Oedekoven v. OedekovenWyoming Supreme Court· 1975-08-12· cited 23×
- Womack v. SwanWyoming Supreme Court· 2018-03-13· cited 23×
- TC & GC v. State (In re L-Mhb)Wyoming Supreme Court· 2018-12-07· cited 23×
- In the Matter of the Paternity of HLG, Minor Child: JN v. RFSGWyoming Supreme Court· 2016-03-11· cited 21×
- Stonham v. WidiastutiWyoming Supreme Court· 2003-12-04· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.