· 3/24/1994
Boyd v. Tennessee State University
Citations
- 848 F. Supp. 111
- 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3781
- 64 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 673
- 1994 WL 102263
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There is no express consent by Tennessee, neither within the THRA nor elsewhere, to a suit in federal court for claims under the THRA.”
- “since the original complaint was filed in this court rather than in state court, such a remand would be improper”
- “There is no express consent by Tennessee, neither within the THRA nor elsewhere, to suit in federal court for claims under the THRA.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wiseman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.