Skip to main content
· 3/24/1994

Boyd v. Tennessee State University

Citations

  • 848 F. Supp. 111
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3781
  • 64 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 673
  • 1994 WL 102263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There is no express consent by Tennessee, neither within the THRA nor elsewhere, to a suit in federal court for claims under the THRA.”
  • “since the original complaint was filed in this court rather than in state court, such a remand would be improper”
  • “There is no express consent by Tennessee, neither within the THRA nor elsewhere, to suit in federal court for claims under the THRA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiseman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.