Boyd v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that testimony concerning the decedent’s statement that he did not want his son to be a beneficiary or payee of certain annuities was admissible because the statement was against the interest of his estate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jones v. Abraham
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-04-13· cited 49×
• O'FALLON v. O'Fallon Ex Rel. Ngar
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-04-20· cited 28×
• Denton v. Pennington
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2003-05-14· cited 3×
• Matthews v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1997-03-12· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ryan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1990-02-28· cited 36×
• State v. Reeves
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1978-11-27· cited 34×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-05-01· cited 34×
• Hall v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-06-19· cited 10×
• Findley v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-10-30· cited 10×