Skip to main content

Boyd v. State

Citations

  • 106 So. 3d 11
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 334
  • 2013 WL 135170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that post-conviction remedy clock runs, for the purposes of challenging sentencing, when movant’s sentence is filed
  • “The relevant date for finality of a sentencing order is the date the written order is filed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Morris, Villanti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.