Boyd v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[U]nder the rules of statutory construction, where the meaning of a statute or regulation is clear and unambiguous, a court will not consider the heading of the statute or regulation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State, Office of Public Advocacy, Office of Elder Fraud & Assistance v. Estate of Jean R.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2016-04-22· cited 7×
• Tweedy v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment and Appeals
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2014-08-15· cited 5×
• Dickie v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2012-07-27· cited 1×
• Tweedy v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment and Appeals
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2014-06-20

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State, Department of Highways v. Green
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-09-01· cited 98×
• Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1991-09-20· cited 73×
• Millman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1992-11-13· cited 59×
• Wilson v. State, Department of Corrections
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2006-01-20· cited 15×