Nevada Supreme Court· 12/13/1965
Boyd v. McDonald
Citations
- 408 P.2d 717
- 81 Nev. 642
- 1965 Nev. LEXIS 282
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that evidence of later conveyances by original owner was only relevant to show intentions with respect to initial severance
- holding that property owners generally have no right to a particular view
- noting that evidence of later conveyances by original owner was only relevant to show intentions with respect to initial severance
- noting that evidence of later conveyances by original owner was only relevant to show intentions with respect to initial severance
- concluding that an implied easement exists where “the owner of two parcels had so used one to the benefit of [the] other that, on selling the benefited parcel, a purchaser could reasonably have expected, without further inquiry, that these benefits were included in the sale”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Badt, Thompson, Zenoff, McNamee, Eighth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sowers v. Forest Hills SubdivisionNevada Supreme Court· 2013-02-14· cited 94×
- Carroll v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2001-10-26· cited 76×
- Herrera v. Roman Catholic ChurchNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-07-11· cited 49×
- Cole v. GilvinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2001-10-19· cited 39×
- Exxon Corp. v. SchutzmaierCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1976-04-15· cited 36×
- Summit Land Co. v. Allen (In Re Summit Land Co.)D. Utah· 1981-08-18· cited 30×
- St. James Village, Inc. v. CunninghamNevada Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 29×
- Frederic & Barbara Rosenberg Living Trust v. MacDonald Highlands Realty, LLCNevada Supreme Court· 2018-09-13· cited 19×
- Probasco v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court· 1969-10-21· cited 16×
- D'Addario v. TruskoskiConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-04-11· cited 11×
- Porter v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-12-09· cited 9×
- Wright v. Horse Creek RanchesColorado Court of Appeals· 1983-02-14· cited 7×
- Club v. Palisades Interstate Park CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-01-30· cited 5×
- Alrich v. BaileyNevada Supreme Court· 1981-07-02· cited 4×
- Bigge Crane & Rigging Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-10-04· cited 3×
- ROSENBERG LIVING TRUST VS. MACDONALD HIGHLANDS REALTY, LLC C/W 70478Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-09-13
- Myers Vs. MillerNevada Supreme Court· 2021-09-16
- Jones v. GhadiriNevada Supreme Court· 2024-04-18
- 440 North SF v. Vista Heights InvestmentsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2024-05-16
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Keats v. HugoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1874-06-18· cited 43×
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-02-09· cited 42×
- Hellberg v. Coffin Sheep Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1965-07-22· cited 39×
- Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court· 1959-09-09· cited 34×
- Adams v. CullenWashington Supreme Court· 1954-04-02· cited 33×
- Taliaferro v. SalyerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-08-12· cited 18×
- Chollar-Potosi Mining Co. v. KennedyNevada Supreme Court· 1867-07-01· cited 14×
- Bank of Nevada v. Drayerhanson, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court· 1954-05-25· cited 6×
- Wilbur v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1955-11-15· cited 5×
- Montesa v. GelmstedtNevada Supreme Court· 1954-05-25· cited 1×
Other cases named Boyd v. McDonald
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.