Boyd v. Direct Capital Corp. (In Re Pizzano)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• calling party’s argument that fixtures are not a \type” of collateral defined in the UCC \a dubious proposition”
• enforcing a security agreement that described the collateral as “goods”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).