Skip to main content

Boyd v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 439 S.W.3d 126
  • 2014 Ky. LEXIS 338
  • 2014 WL 4116492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding witness testimony improper where they “testified to events that they did not perceive in real time[]”
  • concluding witnesses lacked personal knowledge of events captured in video when they “did not perceive [the events] in real time”
  • finding that lay witnesses could narrate segments of a recording depicting events they “perceived in real time,” but not parts of the video “they did not perceive in real time”
  • “We established in Morgan that narration of video footage is permissible under certain circumstances, and improper when the witnesses interpret the footage or offer an opinion[.]”
  • “We established in Morgan that narration of video footage is permissible under certain circumstances, and improper when the witnesses interpret the footage or offer an opinion[.]”
  • “We established in Morgan that narration of video footage is permissible under certain circumstances, and improper when the witnesses interpret the footage or offer an opinion[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.