Skip to main content
· 10/25/2023

Boyd v. Central Coast Community Energy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a claim must be facially plausible in order to survive a motion to dismiss
  • holding that a claim must be facially plausible in order to survive a motion to dismiss
  • holding that a claim must be facially plausible in order to survive a motion to dismiss
  • holding that plaintiffs are required to plead facts that “nudge” their claims “across the line from conceivable to plausible”
  • holding that the pleading standard set forth in Twombly applies to all civil actions
  • holding that the pleading standard articulated is applicable to all civil actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.