· 2/11/1888
Boyd v. Cauthen
Citations
- 28 S.C. 72
- 5 S.E. 170
- 1888 S.C. LEXIS 18
Syllabus
<p>1. Under section 400 of the Code a party is prohibited from testifying that an account with one now deceased was correct, as such testimony was, in substance and effect, a statement that the services had been rendered under a contract or upon request.</p> <p>2. The competent testimony being too vague to sustain the judgment of a trial justice, the Circuit Judge did not err in remanding the case for anew trial.</p>
Judges: Lancaster, Simpson, Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.