Boyd v. Board of Council

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evaluating MSOP patient’s First Amendment claims “in light of appropriate therapeutic interests as well as relevant safety and security concerns”
• discussing the application of Turner in the context of civil commitment
• civilly committed plaintiffs raised plausible claim that First Amendment rights may be violated by overly restrictive policies limiting phone use despite fact that plaintiff had not identified specific policy at issue and court could not apply Turner factors at pleading stage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).