· 6/2/1982
Boyce Const. Corp. v. DISTRICT BD., ETC.
Citations
- 414 So. 2d 634
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e believe that justice can be served in this case only by reversal and remand for a new trial.”
- one cannot recover on a claim for unjust enrichment when the issue was neither pleaded nor tried by the express or implied consent of the other party
- following rule stated in § 374, Restatement (Second) of Contracts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cobb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.