Skip to main content
· 6/2/1982

Boyce Const. Corp. v. DISTRICT BD., ETC.

Citations

  • 414 So. 2d 634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e believe that justice can be served in this case only by reversal and remand for a new trial.”
  • one cannot recover on a claim for unjust enrichment when the issue was neither pleaded nor tried by the express or implied consent of the other party
  • following rule stated in § 374, Restatement (Second) of Contracts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cobb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.