Boyattia v. Hinojosa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding when defendant was served two weeks after suit filed and citation remained with court clerk during all but one day of that two-week period, that delay in effecting service not unreasonable
• holding when defendant was served two weeks after suit filed and citation remained with court clerk during all but one day of that two-week period, that delay in effecting service not unreasonable
• holding when defendant was served two weeks after suit filed and citation remained with court clerk during all but one day of that two-week period, that delay in effecting service not unreasonable
• holding when defendant was served two weeks after suit filed and citation remained with court clerk during all but one day of that two-week period, that delay in effecting service not unreasonable
• providing that a plaintiff “who wholly ignores her duty to have the citation served on the defendant during a lengthy period of time [in which] the citation remains with the clerk does not manifest a bona fide intention to have process served”
• affirming dismissal where plaintiff took no action during three-month period citation was with clerk

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).