Boyajian v. Starbucks Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff survived summary judgment based on employer’s conduct during and after the interview and the employer’s hiring data
• describing the fourth element as requiring a plaintiff to show “that, after her rejection, the position remained open and the employer continued to seek applicants with plaintiff’s qualifications”
• “weaknesses . . . in the employer’s proffered legitimate reasons” can be circumstantial evidence of discrimination
• “Maine courts apply the MHRA in accordance with federal anti-discrimination law, including the ADEA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).