Bowytz v. Skolnick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• required element of either section 1 or section 2 violation — with the exception of per se restraints — is proof of “relevant product market”
• franchisee's evidence of his average income from the operation of the franchised gas station was sufficient to support the jury's verdict
• intent may be inferred from proof of actual monopoly power

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).