Bowoon Sangsa Co. v. Micronesian Industrial Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, before the Supreme Court tightened up the requirements for Article III standing in Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992), that intervention as of right requires an interest greater than that required for Article III standing
• majority notes that the Council's allegations against the Secretary were \of the type for which mandamus would provide a remedy.\
• majority notes that the Council’s allegations against the Secretary were “of the type for which mandamus would provide a remedy.”
• non-profit organization’s interest in preserving the aesthetic and environmental values of public land “is not the type of interest which justifies intervention under Rule 24(a)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).