Skip to main content
· 8/21/1980

Bowmar Instrument Corp. v. Continental Microsystems, Inc.

Citations

  • 497 F. Supp. 947
  • 31 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 805
  • 208 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 496
  • 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that continued use of a mark after termination of a license constitutes trademark infringement
  • “It is not necessary for the plaintiff to demonstrate actual confusion and the defendant’s product need not be in direct competition with the products rightfully sold under the plaintiff’s mark”
  • default entered for failure to produce documents and appear at deposition
  • ex licensee uses plaintiff’s trademark on unauthorized products

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tenney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.