Bowman v. Tilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disallowing claim filed by the Government, finding that it was barred by a federal statute of limitations
• applying Virginia law to procedural issues despite a choice of law clause in the agreement
• accepting debtors’ assertion of Virginia’s statute of limitations, which carries restrictions similar to 5.C. § 15-3-530, as “applicable law” which made creditor’s claim “unenforceable against the debtor” under § 502(b)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).