Skip to main content
· 12/23/1977

Bowman v. Pamida, Inc.

Citations

  • 261 N.W.2d 594
  • 1977 Minn. LEXIS 1313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • treating an order for judgment as a “decision or order,” notice of which is sufficient to trigger the timeline of rule 59.03

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogosheske, Kelly, MacLaughlin, Otis, Todd, Yetka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.