Skip to main content
· 4/10/1912

Bowman v. Jones-Hughes Coal Co.

Citations

  • 147 Ky. 672
  • 145 S.W. 373
  • 1912 Ky. LEXIS 314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a cause of action for unjust enrichment cannot lie where an enforceable contract governs the disputed matter
  • Without some “documentation showing that transfer would be financially burdensome, this factor is neutral.”
  • Without some “documentation showing that transfer would be financially burdensome, this factor is neutral.”
  • “While plaintiffs’ unjust enrichment claim is derived from the same set of facts as plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim, plaintiffs may plead alternative theories of liability at this stage because [defendant] disputes the existence of an agreement.
  • denying Woodway’s motion to dismiss and motion to transfer
  • denying Woodway’s motion to dismiss and motion to transfer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.