Bowman v. Hartig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no fraud where “the customer was told that the broker’s primary purpose was to make profits for the customer” because such statements constituted “nothing more than the common puff of a salesman and must be looked at from the point of view of a reasonable person.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).