Bowman v. Goad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, in the context of interpreting a permissive use provision of an omnibus clause, “the person ostensibly giving permission or consent must have the power to do so” (emphasis omitted)
• stating that, in the context of refunds, “the General Assembly has now provided broad 14 administrative refund remedies covering every type of tax, fee, or charge improperly collected by a Maryland governmental entity.”
• stating that, in the context of refunds, “the General Assembly has now provided broad 14 administrative refund remedies covering every type of tax, fee, or charge improperly collected by a Maryland governmental entity.”
• personal belongings of defendant, including receipt and letter addressed to defendant introduced as circumstantial evidence that defendant was habitual visitor and had significant connection to premises
• “The issue of sufficiency of the evidence is not preserved when appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal is on a ground different than that set forth on appeal.”
• because “no common law action lies for the recovery of taxes or governmental fees which the plaintiff has voluntarily paid under a mistake of law ... any statutorily prescribed [administrative] refund remedy is exclusive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).