Skip to main content
· 7/12/1989

Bowman v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

Citations

  • 724 F. Supp. 493
  • 1989 WL 130561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Interpretation and application of this policy to a particular circum stance shall be made by Firestone”
  • “without further evidence of discriminatory use, [use of Age Data] forms [is] not supportive of plaintiffs’ age discrimination claim”
  • plan stated that “Interpretation and application of this policy to a particular circumstance shall be made by Firestone.”
  • payment of severance benefits in instances where successor corporation will likely continue to operate is designed as compensation for possibility of lower pay or benefits
  • severance denied to former employees of company division sold to another company where former employees took jobs with new company and where employee handbook explicitly exempted such individuals from receiving severance
  • review under the arbitrary and capricious standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sam H. Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.