Bowman v. Callahan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the court concluded that the references in products-completed operations hazard provision to “ ‘another contractor or subcontractor’ and ‘job site’ reflect that this provision is intended to cover offsite contractor work,” not environmental contamination claims
• the court concluded that the references in products-completed operations hazard provision to “ ‘another contractor or subcontractor’ and ‘job site’ reflect that this provision is intended to cover offsite contractor work,” not environmental contamination claims
• the court concluded that the references in products-completed operations hazard provision to “ ‘another contractor or subcontractor’ and ‘job site’ reflect that this provision is intended to cover offsite contractor work,” not environmental contamination claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).