Bowman v. Bank of America NA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• compiling cases that have rejected the notion that low response rates from minority groups amount to a problem inherent in the jury selection process, such that SUPREME COURT low response rates could be considered systematic exclusion
• \[T]he mere happenstance of an unrepresentative jury panel taken from a properly assembled Qualified Wheel does not violate the Constitution.\
• \[T]he mere happenstance of an unrepresentative jury panel taken from a properly assembled Qualified Wheel does not violate the Constitution.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).