Skip to main content
· 5/1/1981

Bowling v. Enomoto

Citations

  • 514 F. Supp. 201
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13710

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emergency conditions, not shown in that case, might warrant unrestricted opportunities for female officers to inspect male inmates
  • freedom from unrestricted observation of genitals and bodily functions required
  • female guards viewing male inmates

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweigert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.